This is a disaster for tennis. Just say it simply.Rafael Nadal will not play Wimbledon, which starts next week. He announced it on Friday, after two weeks of rehab for tendinitis in his knees.
"I'm better than I was a few weeks ago," he said. "And I just don't feel ready."
The disaster isn't just for the big party tennis was about to have, a two-week celebration of last year's classic Nadal-Federer Wimbledon final. That might have been the greatest match of all time, and even if it wasn't, it jump-started an entire sport.
Instead, there will be one giant hole in the middle of the Wimbledon draw.
And even bigger, this is the beginning of the end for Nadal. Oh, he'll get past this over the summer, and storm the courts at the U.S. Open again. I'm not saying he'll disappear in a few months, but he's not going to be around for years and years. Not without major adjustments in his game and his schedule.
It's the first sign of just how tenuous his rivalry with Federer, the best individual rivalry in sports, might be.
"If my career lasts for three more years, it lasts for three more years," Nadal said in the New York Times earlier this month. "I still want to improve at tennis. If it's two more years, then it's two. If it's five more years, perfect."
Two more years? Is it possible that that's all we'll get of this guy?
I know this is unfair, as we don't know exactly how much pain Nadal is in. And he has always been such a fighter. But it's hard to believe he's not going to play.
It seems that he should have tried to fight through this for Wimbledon.
Then rest. If his knees are that bad, then why didn't he rest them some during the clay-court season? Why did he tape them during the French Open?
As Andy Roddick put it last week, while saying he figured Nadal would play:
"I mean I've had tendinitis for years and years and years and years. On a positive side for Rafa, it's not something that ... you know, it's uncomfortable and it's painful, but it's not something that's going to be a career-threatening injury if you play on it.
"You know, it's kind of a fancy term for overuse."
You know, Nadal puts more punishment on his body than any tennis player ever has. It's the beauty of his game, really, the way he throws every last drop into every shot.
He's doing something we've never seen before: Storming the court.
But it's too much pressure, too much pounding on a body. If he's going to elongate this career, he's going to have to shorten some points, develop a heavier, flatter serve that might be less reliable, just to get some free points. He can't give his body such a beating even in the early rounds against lesser players.
And he's going to have to play less, skip clay-court tournaments, maybe blow off more of the non-majors.
Or, maybe just stop going to the Australian Open entirely and find a few months of rest between the U.S. Open and French.
"They were saying this years ago, that I couldn't last," Nadal told the Times. "And after four years, I'm better than I ever was. This irritates me, no?
"I'm tired of people telling me I can't go on playing like this. In the end, this is what makes me win, lose, everything. I can't control how I play."
Nadal tried. He traveled to London for rehab, leaving him close to Wimbledon. But he played two exhibitions in the past two days, and they didn't go well.
The Times of London said that during one of them, Uncle Toni Nadal, Nadal's coach and adviser, told Rafa to bend down and pick up a ball, and Nadal apparently said, "I can't."
Nadal lost to Lleyton Hewitt in straight sets on Thursday, and Toni Nadal said afterward that if he were Rafa, he would fly home to Mallorca now and forget about Wimbledon.
Nadal, instead, said he would play another exhibition on Friday, and then decide. Then on Friday, he lost to Stanislas Wawrinka, the world's 18th-ranked player.
Nadal has had a history of foot and knee problems, as the pounding has started to build up. He struggled on his knees in Madrid, before the French Open. But when he lost in the fourth round of the French to Robin Soderling, he insisted his knees were fine.
But shortly after that, Nadal pulled out of a grass-court warm-up tournament for Wimbledon, saying his movement had been limited.
"I am going to give my 200 percent," he said at the time, "to be ready for the most important tournament in the world."
That's the same percent he always gives.
The tennis world debated over Nadal's injury for the past two weeks.
Did Nadal just need a mental break after losing his tournament, the French? Or is he about done already, at least the way we know him?
People don't realize how grueling tennis is. And Nadal, with his style, only adds to that.
"It's an 11-month season where you can't pass the ball to a teammate and you pretty much have to show up every week," Roddick said. "Otherwise, it's your loss.
"You know, we play on different surfaces. We can travel to different continents one week and then ... You know, last year I played in Memphis one week and Dubai the next week followed by Palm Springs the week after that. So you throw all that together, and there is a little bit of wear and tear there, yeah."
So where does this leave Wimbledon? Did I mention the word disaster?
Federer will still be there, sure. And Murray, of Scotland, now has a better path to the final. Great Britain never produces Wimbledon champs.
Wimbledon will still be Wimbledon, but something special will be missing. It's a feeling tennis isn't ready to get used to.
(Like what you read here? Follow me on Twitter: @gregcouch)














Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
6-19-2009 @ 4:02PM
roger007 said...
I love Rafa's determination and style, but it appears he lacks the internal fortitude to play with pain in his quote "favorite Slam". If his knees were really that bad, why on earth would he play TWO pre Wimbldon matches, rather than rest and relax? Roger does not need him to cement his legacy, but it sure was good for tennis. I hope Rafa gets better soon.
Reply
6-19-2009 @ 6:04PM
tantor said...
Did Murray end up in the same part of the draw as Nadal BECAUSE someone knew that Nadal was not going to play ?
Reply
6-19-2009 @ 11:38PM
div5lex said...
this will be no walkover for Roger. If he wins it he will have a challemge in murry to overcome.
Reply
6-19-2009 @ 11:44PM
Ray said...
I'm not sure the last time I read a column which showed a writer so close to tears...over a tennis player! A disastor? A tennis player deciding not to play a tournament, albeit a major one, is hardly a disastor. At most, it is disappointing but to suggest tennis as we know it is doomed due to Nadal's absence is more than a little far fetched. Come on, don't stop there. Insist that he play, regardless of his health. Let's force-feed him to every tennis fan until the mere mention of his name makes us all sick, much as golf writers (and the media in general) have done to Tiger Woods.
A disastor. Give me a break!
Reply
6-20-2009 @ 12:14AM
ROSCAVED said...
It IS a disaster for tennis, because he's the most interesting, most stylish, best player and the biggest draw.
He flew to London hoping to be in good shape. He played those exhibition matches to see how his knees would stand up to the grueling 5-set matches, and also knowing that's all the British public may get to see of him this year.
Rafa, you're a class act. I hope you recover very, very soon. You'll be greatly missed at the Big W.
Check this out: http://www.christconnection.net
Reply
6-20-2009 @ 12:17AM
hardmba said...
Greg Couch potato's love affair with Nadal is showing. So Rafa doesn't want to embarrass himself this year at Wimbledon because he isn't positive he can go out there and beat Federer or Murry or even Hewitt for that matter. Let him be. Let him heal in his own way and wait for him to decide when it is time to play again. You certainly have not a single right to render judgment on his decisions to play or not to play. In the mean time try to show a little respect for the man's privacy. The sport will go on. The fans will go on and the sky is not falling you love starved nitwit.
Reply
6-20-2009 @ 12:49AM
bgk2404 said...
I love Nadal!! I hope he takes time to heal and relax some. Even just watching him play leaves me feeling like I ran a marathon, I can't even imagine how it feels for him. I hope he takes the time he needs and deserves because I'll miss watching him pick at his butt haha :)
Reply
6-20-2009 @ 1:16AM
Aphillyfan said...
Please, Wimbledon will still be Wimbledon without Nadal. It is NOT a disaster! Nadal's a great player but come on, he's not the ONLY great player. I read this not knowing if you were throwing just a slight bit of sarcasm in their, because you really wrote as if this is the most distressing news possible. Tennis players, even great tennis players, pull out of tournaments all the time, and somehow the show still goes on.
Get a grip. Please.
Reply
6-20-2009 @ 1:46AM
reisner5 said...
Let's now appreciate Fed's incredible run, injury free !! Conjures up images of Michael Jordan. The truly great stars figure out how to play at their level injury free. writing off Fed was way premature !! Now playing with confidence we can only guess how many more grnd slams he'll rack up.
Reply
6-20-2009 @ 2:49AM
Laura said...
Nadal is not the best player in tennis. His non-involvement does nothing to lessen the tournament. Nadal was always no more than a flash in the pan. He had a couple of great years - really only one where he was able to win any majors not on clay - which doesn't come close to the accomplishments of Roger Federer. So, this is not going to impact the excitement or importance of Wimbledon. Will Federer break the all-time Slams record and win his 15th? Will Roddick make his comeback here? Will Murray be the first British player in over 70 years to win Wimbledon? Can some of the others break through - Djokovic, Del Potro, Blake, Tsonga, Monfils and a host of others. The men's game is deep with potential and talent and Federer stands way above Nadal. Wimbledon will be absolutely fine without Nadal.
Reply
6-20-2009 @ 7:05AM
marcveleznj said...
I agree and disagree with this article. Agree that is terrible for tennis, everyone enjoyed last year's final and it was great for tennis. But disagree in the "disaster" part. Tennis will be fine, there are other great things going on with tennis. Someone in the comments mentioned as to why Nadal would try to play matches before Wimbledon, well is a good way to test the body and mind. The part I don't understand is why he decided to skip Wimbledon. If anything, playing on grass is much easier on the knees and body then any other surface. The hardcourts here in the US should be a nightmare for Nadal, if his knees are as bad as he says they are, so "stomping" the courts at the US Open is totally a fantasy in Mr. Couch's mind. There are quick solutions you can do for knee pain, if he's in so much in pain get a cortizone shot, take tylenol, it worked for Agassi's back for years, and again I don't understand why he would skip the one event that would be the kindest on his body. I think Nadal's problem is more between the ears then in his knees, sometimes people forget that athletes are put on pedestals and if you fall is a long way down and a big blow for the ego, and by his reactions this seems to be the issue with Rafa. Let's face it, he's a tennis player that works 9 months out of the year, that's his job. Not a year round job. He's not working construction, not doing heavy lifting at a factory, not moving furniture as a mover, he's a tennis player, people around the world deal with pain and do their jobs, they suck it up and work, and his lost at the French, almost 4 weeks ago, is plenty of time to rest for tendinitis. Step up Rafa!!
Reply
6-20-2009 @ 11:09AM
peterjcanepa said...
Nadel is a baby, "all" real super stars and even lesser lights play hurt.
The person that thinks tennis is in trouble because he's not playing best remember, regardless of how great, one man does not a sport make!
Reply
6-20-2009 @ 11:13AM
Dale said...
Which came first,the tennis shoe or the sneaker?
Reply
6-20-2009 @ 1:22PM
cjgdnight said...
The heart of a champion is to compete. Federer competed with mono.... but ouch my knees hurt.
The difference between men and boys is when it gets tough, who quits.
Reply
6-20-2009 @ 3:45PM
mjr15 said...
It is not a disaster...as a matter of fact it will be nice to see someone like Murray or Roddick get a chance to move deepr in the draw. Nice to see a shakeup at the top and maybe discover a new upcoming star.
Reply
6-20-2009 @ 5:51PM
Yinka Demiajayi said...
Nadal skipping Wimbledon exposes the waek heart of a player in the process of slumping and drifting slowly out of the top of the game. True Champions fight on, never fear defeat and keep coming coming back, tenaciously holding on just as Federer has done over the years ultimately giving him victory for a first French open title.
Federer himself said of Nadal and the other few years back tha the they never really sustain the challenge ,long enough and fade off as wehave seen, first Roddick Hewitt,Jokovic and may be now Nadal.
True Champions soldier on. Agassi, Sampras, Mcenroe, Lendl etc kept fighting till the end. Nadal has been shaken thoroughly by his loss of the French open title and is afraid to lose again. Al least it would be said he didn't play Wimledon and not that he lostto a lesser rated player. That's really the point of his jumping out of the tournament.
Reply
6-20-2009 @ 7:31PM
dfilson1004 said...
Tennis reeling??? Uhhh.....yeah, sure.
Reply
6-20-2009 @ 9:21PM
karl said...
I think Rafa is getting terrible advice from his handlers. He states that he does not feel terrible but not 100% to play at his best for two weeks......well Rafa welcome to the concept of aging! Athletes rarely competeat 100% (see Steve McNair, 2008 Federer, Agassi and MANy others) You play with a warrior mentality and have won over many fans including me, but this decision not to "gut it out" at your favorite Slam is an indictment on your legacy and is overwhelmingly perceived as a lack of heart as an athlete and does not help the notion held by non tennis fans that tennis players are primadonnas compared to other sport athletes. If you were up to playing two non Slam matches last week, it would have behooved you to at least try and defend @ Wimbledon and if your kness gave out you then RETIRE, but at least the people get to see you and you are not viewed as perhaps someone who is still reeling from getting thoroughly thrashed at Roland Garos by a margainal player. Bad move Rafa for you and for the sport of tennis. I hope your knees and your psyche heal up soon.
Reply
6-21-2009 @ 5:37PM
cjgdnight said...
Think this goes back to idiot couch's last articles on Nadal being the greatest of this generation... all time???
Think a reasonable person would say you have to compete to be the greatest at anything... Nadal is not even a good champion.
Reply
6-22-2009 @ 9:36AM
onslow552 said...
For the first time in many years, Rafa Nadal made tennis interesting again. Andre Agassi who was always fun to watch, said it best. He (Nadal) always gives credit to th other player and says openly "They played better and should have won" Unlike Mr. Federer who announced: I am the FAVORITE at Wimbledon--
BIG shoes? BIG HEAD !
Reply