NEW YORK -- So now John McEnroe has become the judge and jury over the debate about Serena Williams and the line judge who had the nerve to call foot fault.Think about that. John McEnroe's trademark, equal to his great tennis, is that he spent his career being a jerk to linespeople. Next up, you can go to Michael Vick for advice on proper pet care or Brett Favre on the right time to retire.
This is the absurd, but it isn't funny. McEnroe is fueling a debate that has grown to something much bigger than tennis, tantrums and foot faults. This thing has exploded into a social fight that's lining up in large part, but not entirely, along racial lines.
Mariotti: Serena's Legacy Damaged | Blackistone: Outburst Reflects Society
And I wonder if McEnroe realizes how important he is in this debate, and how irresponsible he's being. Or maybe he just doesn't care.
"In my opinion, you can't call a foot fault there," McEnroe said to ESPN.com. "Just out of the question. Can't do it. It was so close, not as if it was an obvious foot fault. It was miniscule.
"I've seen Serena come back from that position a dozen times against top-flight opponents. The match was not over."
These are the statements the Serena-was-screwed people are using as evidence.
Close? Not obvious? Miniscule? Let me say this:
John McEnroe has no idea whether Serena Williams foot faulted. None.
The TV booth, where announcers sit, is behind the court. You couldn't see it from there. And the camera angle we have gotten from CBS is from behind Serena, low and on her right. McEnroe knows as well as anyone that you can't see from that angle whether the left side of Serena's left foot had crossed onto the line.
Yet he seems to have no problem validating Williams' anger.
And his irresponsibility is bleeding out of his sport and into a societal argument that so often accompanies the subject of the Williams sisters. He is spurring on hard feelings based on what he observed from angles he knows were impossible.
In his role as commentator for ESPN and for CBS, he keeps saying that he cannot defend the indefensible. Presumably, he's talking about Williams telling the linesperson she would take the (bleeping) ball and stuff it down her (bleeping) throat.
But think about this. Why is McEnroe even on TV? Because he is The Show. It's a smart move, and he's usually good. But he became The Show by mistreating linespeople.

He has been celebrated for it, treated like a folk hero for it, and now is being paid for it, rewarded for it. And he is in the position on TV, where most people turn for their tennis coverage.
So if McEnroe is paid for it, then why should Williams be heavily penalized for it?
Come to think of it, my examples of Favre and Vick are wrong. They aren't looked to for their expertise on animals and retirement. McEnroe is for his opinions on anything tennis.
His presence itself, elevated to spokesman for the game, is defense of Williams' actions, and his suggestion that she didn't foot fault at all is defense of her anger.
Here is the truth, by the way. Williams foot faulted. It was not close. I was sitting just behind the line judge, maybe 10 rows up, right on the line. During the match, the guy next to me and I were actually talking about why Kim Clijsters and Williams get so close to the line to serve. Weren't they worried about foot-faulting?
So I started watching the line and the feet on every serve. When Williams moved that left foot forward, and at least an inch onto that thick baseline, I pointed, and so did the guy next to me, before the call was made.
Well, McEnroe seems to say that you can't make that call anyway, even if Williams did foot fault. I keep hearing this argument, comparing tennis and basketball.
But in basketball, there are fouls on every play. Officials can't stop it, so they try to judge which fouls are affecting play.
That's subjective. Tennis is objective. There's a line and a foot. If the foot is on the line, it's a fault. Simple.
If Kobe Bryant put his feet over the free throw line at the end of a tight game, would that be OK? How about bowling? If it comes down to the final frame of a major championship, and one bowler needs a strike, if he slides over the line an inch and knocks down all 10 pins, would we argue just to give it to him? No big deal?
Just because John McEnroe has decided to re-up his career being a jerk to linespeople, and maybe to try in some odd way to defend his own actions from years ago, that's no reason to ignore the rules.
McEnroe, though, from his impossible-to-see position and impossible-to-conclude TV camera angle, has decided that the line judge sitting there on the line with one function and only one, was wrong.
And he was right.
Now, Williams did come back Monday, with an apology, finally. She amended her statement from a day earlier when she kept fighting, saying she had been overly passionate over an "unfair line call."
Still, she said Monday that the call was wrong, and disingenuously said that she'd like to give the line judge a "big ol' hug."
Her tantrum was the worst I've seen in tennis, and you can't just let threats to officials go. But we've seen athletes drop f-bombs, seen plenty of tennis players berate lines people. So let's not go overboard with the punishment.
Of course, no one defends her actions. Luckily for the Serena-was-screwed people, they have McEnroe, the cool-headed arbiter, there building a case.
Email me at gregcouch09@aol.com














Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
9-14-2009 @ 9:38PM
Vinny said...
she should be suspended for i year for threatening to kill that line judge...as for Johnny Mac...his days are far behind him ...very far.
Reply
9-14-2009 @ 10:48PM
toot408 said...
It's okay when others vent their frustration but you guys are very hard on Serena. She has a right to vent and do what other angry tennis players did, but they weren't given exceptional punishment. EVERYONE SHOULD BE TREATED THE SAME PEOPLE!
9-14-2009 @ 10:24PM
davylightning said...
The writer is arguing generalizations against specifics. Yes Mac would yell, throw tantrums, etc., but threaten to shove an f***ing ball down the linesman's throat? I must have missed that one.
Reply
9-14-2009 @ 10:50PM
mkom100 said...
The article is full of "S...t" The guys writing it are poorly trained to judge and certainly not "sportsmen". I am sure they have never been in any sport competition.....they are the kind of "liberal" because they were told to be so !!!! She lost her temper and was right to do so the line judge has no right to call that fault at a crucial time like that ...period. And do not be jealous of McEnroe guys !!! You are just jealous because he is good on TV not you !!!!
Reply
9-14-2009 @ 10:53PM
Octobermoon68 said...
For you idiots who are saying that Serena said she would kill the linesman she did not say no such thing. Then it was not a foot fault and John Mc has a right to have an opinon on this manner cause he played tennis. What sport have you played?
Ooh, for you people who want her suspended for a year Go Ahead. She has other interest that she can due unlike most of the talently tennis players. The Tennis Organization has poor turn outs at most of their events except majors. If they suspend her the would lose out of millions of dollars cause Venus and Serena is who people come to watch so Good Luck with trying to suspend her.
Plus most of you who make stupid comments probably never played a sport, because if you did you would understand that shit happens in the heat of battle.
Reply
9-15-2009 @ 9:19AM
JJ said...
no
9-14-2009 @ 11:20PM
klagger said...
This article is Very Weak. Mc Enroe has a right to his opinion and I tend to respect his, a former champion over a writer who was sitting ten rows up. How could you see the foot fault when even the replays couldnt even pick it up. Serena was wrong but she has had some of the worst call in the game go against her. It was because of one of these bad calls against Serena that we have instant repaly challenges in tennis today.
Reply
9-14-2009 @ 11:22PM
Marvin said...
I watched the whole game and they were shooting for Serena from the beginning of the game. They were making calls on her when Kim balls were out they called them in. It was a sit up from the beginning. I hope this foolishing don't get Serena down. It seems that they were not liking how Serena talked about how good her game was all through the tournment. She is the best in the world of tennis.
Reply
9-15-2009 @ 12:26AM
pedows said...
Mr Couch
How many times are you going to write the same inflammatory drivel? I'm sure you write this so people click on your comments and then you will become relevant. Hell, maybe some will comment on the story and that really looks good! I'll bet this isn't negativism to grab a headline- you're just the only writer with enough guts to " say it like it is".
Reply
9-15-2009 @ 12:38AM
alnjonb83 said...
Technically, Serena didn't threaten to kill the line judge :) hehehe She said she would stick a ball down her throat ;) Based on her choice of words, I haven't seen or heard the word "kill" used during her "episode". As a fan, coach, and former collegiate player; I totally agree with McEnroe. The timing of that "foot fault" was absolutely terrible. Plus, upon replay it's nearly too close to call. It's disheartening when a U.S. Open semi final match is decided by a "controversal foot fault". Let the two hall of famers battle it out rather than shut a legendary rivalry down by a "questionable" "foot fault". In all fairness, In the defense of the line judge, I will say that Serena went to town with her language. Yes, she was extremely harsh and yes she could've argued in a different tone of voice. In Serena's defense, we all know she is one of the most passionate players the game has ever seen. Williams is extremely competitive and she was trying to defend her U.S. Open Championship and naturally she became caught up in the moment and over-reacted. Serena is human, she wears her heart on her sleave and that's why people love and hate watching her battle. She not only destroys the tennis balls, she puts on an electrifying show of skill, determination, and emotion. Williams has been great to the sport of tennis. She along with her sister changed the way women's tennis is played and viewed. Serena continues to fight for women to recieve equal pay in profesional tennis. She has represented the U.S.A. with great pride by winning Olympic Gold Metals and playing for the U.S. Fed Cup team. Last but not least, she has been a strong and proud ambassador for the sport of tennis. Author Ashe, Althea Gibson, and many greats along with up and coming generations would credit Serena Williams as an outstanding talent and human being. She has issued the apology, she is paying the huge fine, and she has shown that she is human and makes mistakes. Look at the big picture and lets move forward.
Reply
9-15-2009 @ 12:45AM
larsarrupp said...
What an idiot this writer is! You DON'T call a foot-fault at this stage of a match. Is this guy running for office or something? Is he looking for Joe Bidens job?
Reply
9-15-2009 @ 12:59AM
longfordmac2 said...
I am with the writer here. She faulted, acted like a spoiled child, and should be punished. White, black, yellow makes no difference. Serena was at fault, literally, and out of order....period.
And in Arthur Ashe Stadium. She's an insult AND a poor example to up and comers.
Reply
9-15-2009 @ 1:01AM
ashleigh said...
Actually, the replays DO show, conclusively, that her foot was on the line. And for those who were actually there, it was an obvious foot-fault... I do not know what television station wasn't showing it at the time, but Mac was way off base to say it wasn't a foot fault, when it clearly was. I saw it. And it, today anyway, was being replayed over and over, so everyone else can now see it, too... Regardless, for those saying you don't call it, why not? They call them on Lleyton Hewitt all the time! If it's a fault, then it's a fault... Should they not call a ball out if it's long or wide? It's insane... If it's a fault (ball or foot), it needs to be called, and I hate fault calls... Especially foot fault calls. Yes, I hate them, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be called... And ANY time someone grabs a ball and says they're going to shove it down someone's throat, well, the outcome of a tennis ball down your throat is death, so yes, she threatened to kill her... She also waved her racquet menacingly, too... And she did this to a diminutive minority judge... All players have outbursts now and then, but it's usually generalized, not personalized... A smashed racquet, which everyone gets penalized for, or a "you cannot be serious" to the chair ump for a stupid call, but this was personal, and directed at one specific person, and was physically threatening, which is clearly beyond anything anyone else has ever done... She should be suspended for this... It was the personal threat, not the F bombs, that made her scary and threatening... Her talent is unsurpassed, but her attitude taints all that, and her apology today is not to be believed...
Reply
9-15-2009 @ 1:07AM
longfordmac2 said...
It is time fans understand that the real class in sports lies with athletes like Derek Jeter, Roger Federer, Phil Mickleson, Kim Clijsters, Payton Manning, Cal Ripken, Mark Teixera, Jorge Posada, Lance Armstrong, David Wright, Pujols, and so many others. The likes of Serena, Vick, Sprewell, Burress, and the steroid junkies like McGwire, Bonds, Paalmiero, Sosa, have all lowered the bar for youngsters with their behavior on and off the field of play.
Reply
9-15-2009 @ 1:08AM
mdhuckleby said...
Very well put, alnjonb83. And klagger, you're right, she is the sole reason for the challenge. She and her sister have paid their dues. Remember when Serena was booed because her sister recused herself from playing because of an injury? She's apologized -twice - let's move on and continue to let her play. She'll continue to fill the tennis seats for as long as she plays!
Reply
9-15-2009 @ 1:13AM
ANGELA LONG said...
agree Serena and Roger's behavior was similar but not equal. Neither was the circumstances at the time of the respective matches; Serena's bogus call gave her opponent match point. i would expect Serena to be more intense and angry especially since this has happened to her before. all u haters don't forget the previous US Open match she lost to Jennifer Capriati on several bogus calls. Serena's behavior was unacceptable; but her conduct at hundreds of matches in her career has always been exemplary even under extreme circumstances; her apology was acceptable and its time to move on. to penalize her any futher as Mr. Carillo suggests while sitting next to John MacEnroe speaks for itself. It is ridiculous this constant grude Carillo has against the Williams sisters. He was so silent when Federer was getting his but kicked; but when Serena is losing she has much to say about her fitness;her game,etc. Mr Carillo news flash Roger has 15 titles;Serena has 11. Both great champions!!! Serena lost her chance to win a major because of a reaction to a bad call and she should have lost if that is the rule. But so should Roger have gotten a warning when he cursed. but he didn't.
Reply
9-15-2009 @ 1:14AM
longfordmac2 said...
Lastly ..... for these so called smart sports fans who think that it was a call that should not have been made consider this ..... the last play of the Super Bowl and the wide out makes a spectacular catch with time elapsing as he catches the ball in the end zone and puts his team ahead. Yet one foot conclusively is "only slightly out of bounds. Give him a touchdown, right. You got to give it to him,Right? Sure. Bend the bloddy rules to accomodate. Sports like life has to have laws and rules. She faulted, freaked, became a violent participant, and she should be dealt with according to USTA guidelines. Oh, and Nixon only ubstructed justice just a little bit. And the Bush admin. only got the facts slightly off, and 4,000 plus have died.
Reply
9-15-2009 @ 1:23AM
longfordmac2 said...
And Johnny Mac...... without question you were a GREAT player. One of the top five in my lifetime .... 1.) Federer 2.)Laver 3.) Sampras, McEnroe 5) my guy, James Scott Connors (sorry Jimmy, Mac was a shade better).
BUT you were, and are, one of the biggest asses ever to play the game. I would rather my boy be runner-up if it meant having class or the winners cup. And Mac, Connors used to stuff your airhole with just a scoldingfrom across the net. He'd shut your mouth like you were a little boy or hand puppet.
Reply
9-15-2009 @ 1:33AM
alnjonb83 said...
longfordmac2, I do agree with some your ideas and I also disagree as well. Yes, Payton Manning, Cal Ripken, and Kim Clijsters are a some of the many upstanding athletes who represent their respected sports extraordinarily well. Now for my grievance:) In response to your "hall of shame", let's state a few facts. Serena Williams did not ruthlessly murder any animals during her match with Clijsters (Your Vick Reference). Serena Williams did not physically choke and scratch the line judge either (Sprewell reference). Also, I will state that Ms. Williams did not bring a loaded gun to Author Ashe Stadium and accidentally shoot herself (Burress). Lastly, Serena Williams has never tested for steriods. She's just that fit. Sometimes, I wish my arms were that ripped :) Again, with all the above stated; please examine the big picture and realize what happened was a one time mistake. Her latest match was the first time and only time thus far that she has ever responded to a line judge in such a manner. Philosophically speaking, how is the tennis world to heal if we continue to scratch and pick over this issue. Serena has admitted to her mistake, she is going to do all she can to pay and demonstrate her remorse and we should let her take responsibility and set things right.
Reply
9-15-2009 @ 1:38AM
thesoleil36 said...
Hello... shoving a "F" tennis ball down your throat is sure death.
Threatening with a waving racket to back up your abuse language is also
confrontational. What would you do if someone attack you like that....
The Lines person is obviously trained to keep her cool and follow protocol.
It seems so obvious Serena actions were who she is: spoiled and self=centered. If she really was aware and honest, during her first interview she would of apologized and not act like she had amnesia. She is not believable... fraud is excellent description by Mr. Couch.
Reply