DOHA, Qatar (AP) -- After months of debate about who is more deserving of the No. 1 ranking, Serena Williams and Dinara Safina will settle the issue on the court at the WTA Tour's season-ending Sony Ericsson Championships.Safina recaptured the top ranking from Williams on Monday, but the margin is so slim that the player who performs better at this week's tournament in Doha will end the year at No. 1.
Safina has held the top spot for 26 weeks this year, but the Russian has faced persistent questions about whether she's worthy of the title without having won a Grand Slam tournament. Williams won her 11th major title at Wimbledon this year, after also taking the Australian Open.
"It would be awesome," Williams said Monday about the prospect of ending 2009 atop the rankings. "It would be really cool. But I would have to win."
Actually, she only has to win one more match than Safina. If both players have equal results, Safina keeps the top ranking.
The eight-player tournament starts Tuesday with a round-robin stage, with the top two players from each group advancing to the semifinals. Williams and Safina are in different groups, meaning they will not face each other until a potential match in the knockout rounds.
Williams was drawn with her sister Venus and Russians Svetlana Kuznetsova and Elena Dementieva. The other group consists of Safina, former No. 1 Jelena Jankovic of Serbia, Victoria Azarenka of Belarus and Danish teenager Caroline Wozniacki.
Safina has 7,731 points in the latest rankings to lead Serena Williams by 155 points. Each win in the round-robin stage here is worth 160 points.
The other six players also have plenty to play for.
The total prize pool is $4.55 million and the champion receives $1.55 million if she completes the tournament undefeated-with $100,000 knocked off for each loss in the round-robin stage.
Venus Williams is the defending champion, while Azarenka and Wozniacki are competing in the event for the first time.
The Williams sisters-who are also playing in the doubles tournament-are the only previous champions, and Venus said the money isn't the only reason she's looking for a repeat.
"Last year was definitely a monumental moment," she said. "I never thought it would feel so good to actually win the year-end championships. It was definitely a surprised feeling at the end. I would love to feel that again."
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. Active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.
















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-26-2009 @ 5:41PM
imustbegoingnow said...
How can anyone say the rankings system is flawed. It awards points to the players who play the most and win consistently. You don't play, you don't get points. And why do people insist that the mark of greatness for a player is how well they have done for four tournaments out of the year. The women who are considered the true greats of the sport are the ones who played and won, over and over, not just Majors.
Navrotilova won 344 titles. Graf only won 118 total. Was Graf the better player because she won more Majors than Navrotilova? Hardly.
Reply
10-26-2009 @ 6:30PM
safee45 said...
The bottom line is Serena will end up the year as #1 because she's a better and more talented player than Safina and the system will rightly reward her for her results over the past year!
10-27-2009 @ 6:50AM
karog14 said...
Please......if a player is #1, shouldn't he/she at least have won a major tournament at some point in his/her career? Just because you are "busy" playing alot, and doing decently, doesn't entitle you to be ranked the best player in the world in your sport........it only entitles you to be known as a good, consistent player who plays alot...do they have rankings for that one?
Reply
10-27-2009 @ 7:07AM
samwise246 said...
No, a player does not have to win a major to be ranked number one. All they have to do is play and get points. That is the way the system is set up. True, Major wins get a player more points, but in the end, they do not and should not, count as a players greatest accomplishment. They are each, after all, just another tournament. If all that counts as a great accomplishment is the Majors, why have any other tournaments at all?
10-28-2009 @ 4:33PM
safee45 said...
If Martina or Steffi had won the majority of their matches but were never able to win a major, Would they still be as revered and respected by their peers & tennis fans? If Ali won most of his fights but was never able to lay claim to the championship belt, Would fans still judge him the same? Who cares about minor tournaments? The majors is what excites real tennis fans and is what you are remembered for, And last but not least is what gets you into the hall of fame which is where Serena is headed!!!
Reply